Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVM v.1.2 para 208)
Issue: The DOE shall explain how the most conservative assumption theoretically possible was taken during the period when the methane analyzer Serial No. I-04857 was replaced by the analyzer Serial No. 29326, in particular, which set of data for the methane concentration was assumed between 13/12/09 and 31/12/09.

2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it has assessed the calibration of all the measuring equipment used in project activity in line with the requirement of VVM v.1.2 para 184 given that the assessment of the calibration of COD Reactor, COD Colorimeter, pressure sensors and temperature sensors is not provided in the verification report.
In doing so, the DOE shall also explain how it has assessed the use of same pressure sensor (Serial No. AB0F0701052) to measure the pressure reading when monitoring two parameters "Vflaring" and "VTotal" whereas two different temperature sensors have been used to measure the temperature when monitoring these two parameters.