Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (i) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The Monitoring Report has not provided any information with regard to the technical data for small blower under Measure II.

2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters. (EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: The monitoring report has not reported the total values of each parameter for the considered monitoring period.

3: Scope: The verification report does not contain information on all CARs, CLs and FARs and/or provide an assessment and close out of any CARs, CLs or FARs issued. (VVM v.1.2 para 192, 194)
Issue: CAR E3 concluded that the approach taken during the shut down of STG during Sep 2008 to Nov 2008 is conservative. However, the Verification Report has not provided information about the emission factor of the gas turbine that can conclude the approach is conservative. Furthermore, the Verification Report has not provided any information with regard to the shut down of STG outside the above mentioned period that is stated in the monitoring report.

4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: There was an inconsistency of the reported calibration dates for portable power meters (for parameters PC and PB). The Monitoring Report version 04 page 17 reports the dates as 14/02/2007, 04/09/2008 and 03/09/2009, while the Verification Report page 56 reports them as 14/02/2007, 14/02/2008 and 04/09/2008.