18:27 19 May 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE shall provide further information regarding the precision level achieved while conducting sampling for the following parameter CODww,untreated,y, CODww,treated,y, CODww,discharge,PJ,y during the deviation period from 15/05/2015 to 31/12/2019. In doing so, specific information on the sampling/measurement dates and measurement results of samples shall be submitted, as well as how the actual precision achieved is derived. In addition, it is noted that page 15 of the monitoring report indicates COD testing by two accredited lab, which is not consistent with the PRC request indicating COD testing by project participants’ internal lab, the DOE shall clarify the inconsistency.
2: The DOE shall provide further information how it has confirmed that emissions reductions are calculated conservatively considering that lower bound COD values are applied in calculating project emissions PEfugitive,ww,y (i.e. cell AB31 in table “ER 2015-2019”).
3: The proposed corrections indicates that the calibration frequency of Thermocouples are corrected as “The meters will undergo maintenance/calibration as per the manufacturer’s specifications, or at least once every three years”. However, page 23 of the verification report mentions required calibration frequency of every year as per the validity of calibration certificates. The DOE shall clarify the applicable calibration requirements and address the inconsistency.
4: As per the PRC-7245-001 approved in 2020, the biogas engine system for electricity generation has been excluded from the project boundary. In addition, it is noted that no site visit was conducted in this verification. The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has verified and confirmed the destruction of biogas sent outside the project boundary.
5: The values reported in the emission reduction sheet indicates that the biogas collected are supplied to two biogas engines, one biogas boiler and one flare. However, figure 3 of the monitoring report (i.e. Diagram showing all monitoring points for project activity) does not illustrate the supply of biogas to each recipient separately, as well as the respective monitoring points for each recipient. The DOE shall further clarify.
1: The DOE shall provide further information regarding the precision level achieved while conducting sampling for the following parameter CODww,untreated,y, CODww,treated,y, CODww,discharge,PJ,y during the deviation period from 15/05/2015 to 31/12/2019. In doing so, specific information on the sampling/measurement dates and measurement results of samples shall be submitted, as well as how the actual precision achieved is derived. In addition, it is noted that page 15 of the monitoring report indicates COD testing by two accredited lab, which is not consistent with the PRC request indicating COD testing by project participants’ internal lab, the DOE shall clarify the inconsistency.
2: The DOE shall provide further information how it has confirmed that emissions reductions are calculated conservatively considering that lower bound COD values are applied in calculating project emissions PEfugitive,ww,y (i.e. cell AB31 in table “ER 2015-2019”).
3: The proposed corrections indicates that the calibration frequency of Thermocouples are corrected as “The meters will undergo maintenance/calibration as per the manufacturer’s specifications, or at least once every three years”. However, page 23 of the verification report mentions required calibration frequency of every year as per the validity of calibration certificates. The DOE shall clarify the applicable calibration requirements and address the inconsistency.
4: As per the PRC-7245-001 approved in 2020, the biogas engine system for electricity generation has been excluded from the project boundary. In addition, it is noted that no site visit was conducted in this verification. The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has verified and confirmed the destruction of biogas sent outside the project boundary.
5: The values reported in the emission reduction sheet indicates that the biogas collected are supplied to two biogas engines, one biogas boiler and one flare. However, figure 3 of the monitoring report (i.e. Diagram showing all monitoring points for project activity) does not illustrate the supply of biogas to each recipient separately, as well as the respective monitoring points for each recipient. The DOE shall further clarify.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: