15:13 19 Oct 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Does the validation report determine whether the project participants proposed alternative monitoring arrangements or applied the most conservative values approach referred to in the PS for the non-conforming monitoring period?
The DOE validated that the sampling for parameters Wsteam,CO2,y and Wsteam,CH4,y was not quarterly in accordance with the registered PDD, but only two analysis were made in 2015. The DOE states that it checked the KenGen Lab reports, confirmed that the maximum values measured during the monitoring period were applied for the second and fourth quarter of 2015, and assessed the calculation as conservative. The DOE is requested to provide further information on how it deemed this approach to be in line with paragraph 282 of VVS PA v02.
2: Does the spreadsheet contain the formulae for the calculation of emission reductions or net anthropogenic removals as required by the registered monitoring plan, the applied methodologies, the applied standardized baselines and the other applied methodological regulatory documents?
The spreadsheets containing the calculation of the grid emission factor for years 2015, 2016 and 2017 show that the weights applied for the Build Margin and Operating Margin are 0.5. However, for year 2018, the weights of 0.25 and 0.75 were applied for the Operating Margin and Build Margin, respectively.
1: Does the validation report determine whether the project participants proposed alternative monitoring arrangements or applied the most conservative values approach referred to in the PS for the non-conforming monitoring period?
The DOE validated that the sampling for parameters Wsteam,CO2,y and Wsteam,CH4,y was not quarterly in accordance with the registered PDD, but only two analysis were made in 2015. The DOE states that it checked the KenGen Lab reports, confirmed that the maximum values measured during the monitoring period were applied for the second and fourth quarter of 2015, and assessed the calculation as conservative. The DOE is requested to provide further information on how it deemed this approach to be in line with paragraph 282 of VVS PA v02.
2: Does the spreadsheet contain the formulae for the calculation of emission reductions or net anthropogenic removals as required by the registered monitoring plan, the applied methodologies, the applied standardized baselines and the other applied methodological regulatory documents?
The spreadsheets containing the calculation of the grid emission factor for years 2015, 2016 and 2017 show that the weights applied for the Build Margin and Operating Margin are 0.5. However, for year 2018, the weights of 0.25 and 0.75 were applied for the Operating Margin and Build Margin, respectively.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: