23:15 29 Jan 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: VVS-PA Para 374(b) and 365
The date of calibration of steam flow meters and pressure gauge in 2012 is different in the monitoring report for current monitoring period and that in the monitoring report for the first monitoring period. Example: Date of calibration of steam flow meters was 24/01/2012 (with due date as 23/01/2013) in the first monitoring report and the same is 23/02/2012 (with due date as 22/02/2013) in the monitoring and verification reports for this monitoring period. The DOE is therefore requested to clarify how it cross-checked the calibration date and confirmed that calibration of the measuring equipment is conducted by the project participants at the frequency specified in the registered monitoring plan. Refer Para 374 (b) and 365 of VVS-PA, version 3.0
2: VVS-PA Para 374 (b)
The DOE is requested to explain how it cross-checked the reported data as:
1. As per the verification report, the 6TPH boiler was not operational from 2013 to 2019, however, as per the ER Spreadsheet, 6TPH boiler operated in 2013 and Nov-Dec 2018 and the steam generation is used for calculation purposes.
2. Page 5 of the monitoring report shows the days on which the 10TPH boiler was shut down due to maintenance purposes. However, even for days where the boiler is shut down, the ER spreadsheet shows steam generation and rice husk consumption. Example: plant was shut down from 09/07/2014 to 17/07/2014 but the ER spreadsheet shows steam generation and rice husk consumption on these days.
Refer Para 374 (b) of VVS-PA, version 3.0.
1: VVS-PA Para 374(b) and 365
The date of calibration of steam flow meters and pressure gauge in 2012 is different in the monitoring report for current monitoring period and that in the monitoring report for the first monitoring period. Example: Date of calibration of steam flow meters was 24/01/2012 (with due date as 23/01/2013) in the first monitoring report and the same is 23/02/2012 (with due date as 22/02/2013) in the monitoring and verification reports for this monitoring period. The DOE is therefore requested to clarify how it cross-checked the calibration date and confirmed that calibration of the measuring equipment is conducted by the project participants at the frequency specified in the registered monitoring plan. Refer Para 374 (b) and 365 of VVS-PA, version 3.0
2: VVS-PA Para 374 (b)
The DOE is requested to explain how it cross-checked the reported data as:
1. As per the verification report, the 6TPH boiler was not operational from 2013 to 2019, however, as per the ER Spreadsheet, 6TPH boiler operated in 2013 and Nov-Dec 2018 and the steam generation is used for calculation purposes.
2. Page 5 of the monitoring report shows the days on which the 10TPH boiler was shut down due to maintenance purposes. However, even for days where the boiler is shut down, the ER spreadsheet shows steam generation and rice husk consumption. Example: plant was shut down from 09/07/2014 to 17/07/2014 but the ER spreadsheet shows steam generation and rice husk consumption on these days.
Refer Para 374 (b) of VVS-PA, version 3.0.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: