Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports (VVS v2, para 236, 284 (e)).
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the determination of the flare efficiency in particular the use of the default value of 90% in the absence of the information regarding the manufacturer's specification of the flare system and how it had been complied with.

2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan (VVS v2, para 243)
Issue: In regard to the delayed calibration of temperature transmitters of Flare 1 and GSS, and the pressure transmitter of GSS, the Monitoring Report states that the adjustments have been made and that the impact is negligible. The Verification Report has also mentioned that the adjustments have been made. However, the Emission Reductions spreadsheet does not show that the adjustments have been made. Furthermore, the DOE has not provided its assessment regarding the statement in the Monitoring Report that the impact is negligible.