04:50 24 Jan 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The revised PDD does not provide details that the assumptions or discount factors used for GHG emission reductions calculations are not over-estimated as a result of the change ((PS v1, para 217)
Issue: With regard to the change of accuracy of meter B from 0.5S to 1.0S, the revised PDD does not provide details on the discount factor used for baseline emission calculation in line with the requirements of para 4(a) of Appendix 1 to the Project Standards.
2: Scope: The validation opinion does not contain information on how the DOE validated that the changes from the registered monitoring plan are in accordance to para 4 and 5 of the Appendix 1 of Project Standard which do not require prior approval of the Board (VVS v2, para 248,262)
Issue: The validation opinion does not contain information on how the DOE validated the accordance of the change with the requirement of para 4(a) of Appendix 1 to the Project Standard.
3: Scope: The revised PDD does not contain a summary of impacts of the proposed or actual changes to the registered CDM project activity regarding: a) the applicability and application of the applied methodology under the project activity has been registered; b)compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied methodology; c) the level of accuracy and completeness in the monitoring of the project activity; d) the additionality of the project activity; e) the scale of the project activity (PS v1, para 219)
Issue: The revised PDD does not contain a summary of the impacts of the proposed change in line with the requirement of para 219 of hte Project Standards version 1.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVS v2, para 246 (c), 284 (i))
Issue: the Verification Report does not contain information on how the DOE verified the correct application of para 4(a) of Appendix 1 to the Project Standard to the calculation of baseline emisison.
1: Scope: The revised PDD does not provide details that the assumptions or discount factors used for GHG emission reductions calculations are not over-estimated as a result of the change ((PS v1, para 217)
Issue: With regard to the change of accuracy of meter B from 0.5S to 1.0S, the revised PDD does not provide details on the discount factor used for baseline emission calculation in line with the requirements of para 4(a) of Appendix 1 to the Project Standards.
2: Scope: The validation opinion does not contain information on how the DOE validated that the changes from the registered monitoring plan are in accordance to para 4 and 5 of the Appendix 1 of Project Standard which do not require prior approval of the Board (VVS v2, para 248,262)
Issue: The validation opinion does not contain information on how the DOE validated the accordance of the change with the requirement of para 4(a) of Appendix 1 to the Project Standard.
3: Scope: The revised PDD does not contain a summary of impacts of the proposed or actual changes to the registered CDM project activity regarding: a) the applicability and application of the applied methodology under the project activity has been registered; b)compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied methodology; c) the level of accuracy and completeness in the monitoring of the project activity; d) the additionality of the project activity; e) the scale of the project activity (PS v1, para 219)
Issue: The revised PDD does not contain a summary of the impacts of the proposed change in line with the requirement of para 219 of hte Project Standards version 1.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVS v2, para 246 (c), 284 (i))
Issue: the Verification Report does not contain information on how the DOE verified the correct application of para 4(a) of Appendix 1 to the Project Standard to the calculation of baseline emisison.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: