Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification and certification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the revised monitoring plan as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 392.
Issue: The project only claims emission reductions for the period 26/04/2014 to 25/10/2014 as no monitoring of the project was realized prior to 26/04/2014.
(a) As the monitoring was not conducted during the period prior to 26/04/2014, the DOE is requested to explain why it did not request post registration changes for temporary deviation to the monitoring plan, as this is not in line with the registered monitoring plan. Please refer to paragraph 298 of the VVS version 09.0.
(b) Furthermore, considering the project has been in operation since end of 2012, the DOE is also requested to explain how it is in accordance with the version 09.0 of VVS or CDM project standard, to not claim the emission reductions during the period when the monitoring was not carried out as per the monitoring plan.

2: Scope: The verification and certification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 393 and 409 (e).
Issue: While the reliability of the survey for parameter Si,y has been provided (i.e. 4%, for proportional value), the reliability for parameter TDC/M/T,y (Average trip distance of BRT passengers who in the absence of the BRT would have used passenger cars, taxis or motorcycles), a mean value, has not been provided and verified by the DOE as required by the Standard for sampling and surveys for CDM project activities and programmes of activities, version 05.0, paragraph 24(a). The same issue was raised in the previous submission, but no response was provided in this regard.