Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
Scope:

As per paragraph 357 (b) of the VVS-PA (version 1.0), the DOE shall identify any concerns related to the conformity of the actual CDM project activity and its operation with the registered project design document and determine whether any deviation or the proposed or actual changes in the implementation or operation of the project activity comply with the relevant requirements of the “CDM project standard for project activities”.

Also, as per paragraph 359 (c) of the VVS-PA (version 1.0), the DOE shall report the information (data and variables) provided in the monitoring report that is different from that stated in the registered PDD or any approved revised PDD.

Issue:

As per Monitoring Report (page 9 and 11), the monitored values of the parameter Apj (km2) (i.e. the area of the reservoir measured in the surface of the water, after the implementation of the project activity, when the reservoir is full) were 1.10 (km2) and 1.05 (km2) during this monitoring period. However, these values are significantly lower than the value (1.5 km2) reported in the registered PDD (page 26), which stated that the parameter value was also measured by meters in project activity site from topographical surveys and maps.

Therefore, the DOE is requested to provide further explanation on the significant difference between the PDD value and monitored value for the area of the reservoir in accordance with para 359(c) and 357(b) of the VVS-PA, version 1.0.

When addressing the above, the DOE is also requested to correct power density values reported in Verification Report (5.5W/m2 and 5.6 W/m2 in page 23), in line with the values reported in Monitoring Report (4.55 W/m2 and 4.76 W/m2 in table E.2 of page 11) and ER calculation sheet (4.55 W/m2 and 4.76 W/m2).