Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: The Monitoring Report does not contain information about the manufacturer's specifications with respect to the weekly on-line calibration of the gas analyzers.

2: Scope: The verification report does not describe the reasons for the phased-implementation delay and/or does not present the expected implementation dates. (VVM v.1.2 para 198 (a)).
Issue: According to the registered PDD, the project design consisted of 16 MW gas engine power generation capacity (8*0.5 MW) and 7 vocsidizer in 2007/2008 and 2009, respectively. According to the monitoring plan and the verification report, up till now, 6 gas engines (12 MW) and 1 vocsidizer has been installed; the DOE has explained that the remaining are planned to be installed between 2013 and 2015. However, the DOE has not provided information on how it has assessed how likely that the remaining equipment will be installed in the coming years and it is not likely to be a permanent change to the project design. Please provide supporting evidence to demonstrate that the planned implementation of the remaining equipment is likely.

3: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The verification report does not contain information on how the DOE has verified the compliance of the calibration of gas analyzers with the manufacturer's specifications, particularly regarding the weekly on-site test.