17:19 06 Oct 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: Monitoring points for gross electricity generation, auxiliary electricity consumption, power import (main and check meter), and power export (main and check meter) are not clearly indicated in the line diagrams.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters. (EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: Section D of the Monitoring Report does not contain the parameter “Surplus biomass availability” as per requirements of EB54 Annex34.
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: With regard to the parameters “Power import” and “Power export”: i) the monitoring report does not specify frequency and validity of calibrations to be conducted as per the industrial standards and procedures of India as specified in the monitoring plan; ii) the monitoring report considers the calibrations of only two energy meters (Serial N. CSEE29169 and APM20048), while a total of four meters (2 main meters and 2 check meters) should have been installed and calibrated as per description in section C of the monitoring report.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: As specified in the monitoring plan, calibrations of energy meter is to be conducted as per the industrial standards and procedures of India; however, the verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of energy meters is conducted in line with industrial standards and procedures of India.
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: Monitoring points for gross electricity generation, auxiliary electricity consumption, power import (main and check meter), and power export (main and check meter) are not clearly indicated in the line diagrams.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters. (EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: Section D of the Monitoring Report does not contain the parameter “Surplus biomass availability” as per requirements of EB54 Annex34.
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: With regard to the parameters “Power import” and “Power export”: i) the monitoring report does not specify frequency and validity of calibrations to be conducted as per the industrial standards and procedures of India as specified in the monitoring plan; ii) the monitoring report considers the calibrations of only two energy meters (Serial N. CSEE29169 and APM20048), while a total of four meters (2 main meters and 2 check meters) should have been installed and calibrated as per description in section C of the monitoring report.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: As specified in the monitoring plan, calibrations of energy meter is to be conducted as per the industrial standards and procedures of India; however, the verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of energy meters is conducted in line with industrial standards and procedures of India.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: