Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: For each monitoring period, the DOE shall report:
(a) The implementation status of the registered CDM project activity. For a project activity with phased implementation, the DOE shall state the progress of the project activity achieved in each phase under verification. If the phased implementation is delayed, the DOE shall describe the reasons and present the expected implementation dates;
(b) The actual operation of the registered CDM project activity;
Please refer to VVS PA v1.0 paragraph 359.
Page 5 of the monitoring report has indicated that as Phase 4, 322,243 CFLs were distributed from January 2010 to December 2014, and the distribution was monthly recorded. However, from Apr 2014 to Dec 2014 when the distribution is continuing, the number of CFLs account for emission reduction calculation in each month are constant (ER spreadsheet, export component 2, column F and G). The DOE is requested to further substantiate how it verified the implementation status and actual operation of the project activity by providing monthly distribution of CFL referred in the monitoring report.

2: The project participants shall provide all parameters used to calculate the baseline, project and leakage GHG emissions by sources, or the baseline and actual net GHG removals by sinks, as well as other relevant parameters for the monitoring period as required by the applied methodologies, the registered monitoring plan and, where applicable, the applied standardized baselines. The project participants shall provide information on how data and parameters have been monitored. Please refer to PS for PA v1,0 paragraph 260.
Page 8 of monitoring report indicates that the 3rd, 4th and 5th sampling survey have covered phase 4 distributions. However, only the 5th sampling survey result are used for emission reduction calculation. The PP/DOE is requested to clarify how the lamp failure rate (LFR) are determined as per the AMS.II.J version 7.

3: The DOE shall determine whether: (d) Monitoring results are consistently recorded as per the approved frequency. Please refer to VVS PA v1.0 paragraph 364.
The DOE confirms that the CFL distribution for phase 4 lasted from Jan 2010 to Dec 2014. However, only one average lamp failure rate (LFR) determined based on all these distributed lamps regardless the year of distribution are used for ER calculation. The DOE is requested to further substantiate how it has validated the 5th sampling survey for phase 4 distributions as per AMS.II.J v7 paragraph 29(c), where it is required that the ex post monitoring sampling surveys to determine Lamp Failure Rate (LFRi,y) shall be conducted for each batch of project lamps considering that 1) the average lifetime of CFLs are defined as 6000hours or 4.7 years and 2) the CFLs distributed in early 2010 are nearly approaching the end of the lifetime.