10:23 30 Apr 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The DOE closed CAR#4 by stating that the PP has applied the most conservative approach for the delayed calibration of the steam flow meter for the months of May and June 2011. However, the DOE is required to further substantiate how the application of the maximum error of the meter was the most conservative approach as 1) the meter was not calibrated after the replacement and 2) the DOE did not have a result of delayed calibration to confirm the application of the maximum error as per para 4 of Annex 60 of EB 52.
Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The DOE closed CAR#4 by stating that the PP has applied the most conservative approach for the delayed calibration of the steam flow meter for the months of May and June 2011. However, the DOE is required to further substantiate how the application of the maximum error of the meter was the most conservative approach as 1) the meter was not calibrated after the replacement and 2) the DOE did not have a result of delayed calibration to confirm the application of the maximum error as per para 4 of Annex 60 of EB 52.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: