23:14 02 Jul 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Paragraph 242 of PS-PA:
The PP has not reported in the revised PDD the impacts of the change on aspects listed under paragraph 242 of the PS-PA.
2: Paragraph 301 of VVS-PA:
The validation report on section D.7 does not provide information how/what documents the DOE reviewed in order to confirm that the description in the revised PDD reflects the implementation, operation and monitoring of the modified project activity.
3: Paragraph 309(b) of VVS-PA:
The validation report for PRC does not contain anassessment on when the changes occurred, reasons for these changes taking place, whether the changes would have been known prior to the registration of the CDM project activity, how the changes would impact on the overall operation/ability of the CDM project activity to deliver emission reductions or net anthopogenic removals as stated in the PDD, and whether the revised estimation of emission reductions due to the change takes into account the applicable limits in accordance with the “CDM project standard for project activities”.
4: Paragraph 309(c) of VVS-PA:
The validation report for PRC does not contain an assessment regarding whether the changes would adversely affect the conclusion of the validation report with regard to aspects described under paragraph 309(c) of VVS-PA.
5: Paragraph 365 of VVS-PA:
The DOE is requested to explain how it concluded that calibration has been conducted as per the monitoring plan and that there is no delayed calibration, as the calibration frequency required by the monitoring plan is annual, whereas the meters were only calibrated on 19/08/2016 and 30/06/2021.
1: Paragraph 242 of PS-PA:
The PP has not reported in the revised PDD the impacts of the change on aspects listed under paragraph 242 of the PS-PA.
2: Paragraph 301 of VVS-PA:
The validation report on section D.7 does not provide information how/what documents the DOE reviewed in order to confirm that the description in the revised PDD reflects the implementation, operation and monitoring of the modified project activity.
3: Paragraph 309(b) of VVS-PA:
The validation report for PRC does not contain anassessment on when the changes occurred, reasons for these changes taking place, whether the changes would have been known prior to the registration of the CDM project activity, how the changes would impact on the overall operation/ability of the CDM project activity to deliver emission reductions or net anthopogenic removals as stated in the PDD, and whether the revised estimation of emission reductions due to the change takes into account the applicable limits in accordance with the “CDM project standard for project activities”.
4: Paragraph 309(c) of VVS-PA:
The validation report for PRC does not contain an assessment regarding whether the changes would adversely affect the conclusion of the validation report with regard to aspects described under paragraph 309(c) of VVS-PA.
5: Paragraph 365 of VVS-PA:
The DOE is requested to explain how it concluded that calibration has been conducted as per the monitoring plan and that there is no delayed calibration, as the calibration frequency required by the monitoring plan is annual, whereas the meters were only calibrated on 19/08/2016 and 30/06/2021.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: