21:26 15 Jul 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE has clarified that the values for the “percentage of unrecovered/unconverted CO2” are provided by the technology supplier, and further confirmed that these values are applied in column G (workbooks “Ammonia-I Feed RLNG” and “Ammonia-I Feed RLNG”) to adjust the “emissions due to the use of NG/LNG as feed for the production of urea (PE_Feed)”. However, this approach is not in line with the applied methodology (equation No.11) which does not require to adjust the PE_Feed (VVS-PA version 03.0 paragraph 373 (c)). In doing so, please also clarify the resulting negative project emissions (workbook “PE-Feed” Row 10).
2: The DOE has clarified that the data for the parameter “Production of urea” is monitored through the DCS totalizer flowmeters within plant boundaries, and this approach is consistent with the registered monitoring plan. Further DOE has confirmed that this approach differs from the indirect ammonia-input method referenced in the applied methodology. Since the DOE has identified that the registered monitoring plan is not in accordance with the applied methodology AM0050 (Data and parameters monitored- page 19), please clarify why this could not be rectified through a post-registration change process in accordance with the “CDM project cycle procedure for project activities”.
1: The DOE has clarified that the values for the “percentage of unrecovered/unconverted CO2” are provided by the technology supplier, and further confirmed that these values are applied in column G (workbooks “Ammonia-I Feed RLNG” and “Ammonia-I Feed RLNG”) to adjust the “emissions due to the use of NG/LNG as feed for the production of urea (PE_Feed)”. However, this approach is not in line with the applied methodology (equation No.11) which does not require to adjust the PE_Feed (VVS-PA version 03.0 paragraph 373 (c)). In doing so, please also clarify the resulting negative project emissions (workbook “PE-Feed” Row 10).
2: The DOE has clarified that the data for the parameter “Production of urea” is monitored through the DCS totalizer flowmeters within plant boundaries, and this approach is consistent with the registered monitoring plan. Further DOE has confirmed that this approach differs from the indirect ammonia-input method referenced in the applied methodology. Since the DOE has identified that the registered monitoring plan is not in accordance with the applied methodology AM0050 (Data and parameters monitored- page 19), please clarify why this could not be rectified through a post-registration change process in accordance with the “CDM project cycle procedure for project activities”.

Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: