Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
Scope: The validation opinion does not contain information on how the DOE validated that the changes from the registered monitoring plan are in accordance to para 4 and 5 of the Appendix 1 of Project Standard which do not require prior approval of the Board (VVS v2, para 248,262)
Issue: The DOE is further requested to explain how it has validated the change to the monitoring plan, in particular: (a) how the apportioning for parameter EGi,y as stated in the revised PDD page 32 is done; (b) as the monitoring of parameter EGi,y involves the electricity measurement at individual WTGs and the apportionment of electricity for month of November 2010, why calibration of meters at individual WTGs is not part of the monitoring plan. Furthermore, the validation opinion page 11 indicates that electronic tri-vector bi-directional meter used for measurement at the WTG is used for apportioning of net electricity, hence why the metering of individual WTG under the project activity is not part of the monitorin plan; (c) why the latest template of the PDD is not used for the revised PDD. Please refer to page 3 of the document in the link: https://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Notes/gov/info_note35.pdf.