00:59 16 Jun 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Paragraph 360 of VVS-PA:
The verification report does not include information how the DOE verified the conduct of internal audit which is to be carried out every year as required by the monitoring plan.
2: Paragraph 365 of VVS-PA:
The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the calibration of the meters, in particular:
(a) Meters with SN 12090432 and 12090420 have Initial Meter test on 08/03/2014. It is not clear why the Next Calibration Date is stated as 06/04/2015 considering that as per the monitoring plan the frequency of calibration is annually;
(b) The monitoring report and verification report do not clearly indicate the calibration dates of each meter. Unclear information has been observed. For example: (i) it is not clear to which meter(s) calibration dates 25/11/2016 and 11/02/2019 belong to; (ii) When the calibrations for meters with SN 16083091, 15624840, 16112852 and 1209420 were conducted. The DOE/PP is requested to clearly indicate all calibration dates of each meter.
3: Paragraph 373(e) of VVS-PA:
The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the ex-ante fixed parameter EFgrid,OM,y as per the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (version 2.2.1). Page 38 of the registered PDD indicates that value of the parameter is the average of operating margin for the recent 3 years whereas for ex ante option the tool requires the use of 3-year generation-weighted average.
4: Paragraph 391 of VVS-PA:
As this is the request for issuance for the first monitoring period, the DOE is requested to explain why it concluded that global stakeholder consultation is not applicable for the present monitoring period.
5: Paragraph 395(g) of VVS-PA:
Section D.5 of the verification report shows that DOE raised seven CARs. However, appendix 4 of the report only describes six CARs.
1: Paragraph 360 of VVS-PA:
The verification report does not include information how the DOE verified the conduct of internal audit which is to be carried out every year as required by the monitoring plan.
2: Paragraph 365 of VVS-PA:
The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the calibration of the meters, in particular:
(a) Meters with SN 12090432 and 12090420 have Initial Meter test on 08/03/2014. It is not clear why the Next Calibration Date is stated as 06/04/2015 considering that as per the monitoring plan the frequency of calibration is annually;
(b) The monitoring report and verification report do not clearly indicate the calibration dates of each meter. Unclear information has been observed. For example: (i) it is not clear to which meter(s) calibration dates 25/11/2016 and 11/02/2019 belong to; (ii) When the calibrations for meters with SN 16083091, 15624840, 16112852 and 1209420 were conducted. The DOE/PP is requested to clearly indicate all calibration dates of each meter.
3: Paragraph 373(e) of VVS-PA:
The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the ex-ante fixed parameter EFgrid,OM,y as per the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (version 2.2.1). Page 38 of the registered PDD indicates that value of the parameter is the average of operating margin for the recent 3 years whereas for ex ante option the tool requires the use of 3-year generation-weighted average.
4: Paragraph 391 of VVS-PA:
As this is the request for issuance for the first monitoring period, the DOE is requested to explain why it concluded that global stakeholder consultation is not applicable for the present monitoring period.
5: Paragraph 395(g) of VVS-PA:
Section D.5 of the verification report shows that DOE raised seven CARs. However, appendix 4 of the report only describes six CARs.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: