Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (i) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status (e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) of the project activity inline with the requirement of EB48, Annex 68, paragraph 10(a)(i) and EB54 Annex 34.

2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVM v.1.2 para 206 & 221(d))
Issue: The DOE is requested to clarify how the measurement of alternative fuels consumption other than rice husk is in line with the approved revised monitoring plan and applied methodology given that the fuel consumption is calculated using a formula given in the MR (page 14).

3: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The emission factor of the residual fuel oil in the approved revised monitoring plan is 73.33 tCO2/TJ but different residual oil (mixed and automotive oil) with the emission factors (73.33 tCO2/TJ and 85.0 tCO2/TJ) are used in the emission reduction calculation.