Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (i) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue:
The PDD states (page 3) that the design capacity is 270 metric tonnes of HNO3 (100%) per day and that the design operating time is 330 days a year. However the Monitoring report states (page 7) that NAP is compared against nameplate capacity based on 365 days/year. It also states (page 30) that 330 days of operating time per year are assumed.
The project participant is requested to clarify these inconsistencies.

2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue:
The verification report states (page 8) that the design operating time is 330 days a year. However it also states (page 14) that the nameplate (design) implies the total yearly capacity, (considering 365 days of operational time per year).
The DOE is requested to clarify these inconsistencies.