Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters used to calculate baseline, project and leakage emissions as well as other parameters required by the applied methodology and the registered monitoring plan as per PS version 09.0 paragraphs 247 and 248 (a) (c) (d) (e) (f).
Issue: AMS.II.G version 5 paragraph 12 requires that " the KPT should be carried out in accordance with national standards (if available) or international standards or guidelines (e.g. the KPT procedures specified by the Partnership for Clean Indoor Air (PCIA)". The DOE is requested to further substantiate how it has verified that the monitoring of By,new,KPT are in line with national standards or international standards. In particular: (1) how the 3-day measurement at a household are considered as representative biomass consumption pattern for the whole year; (2) the impact to the biomass consumption behaviors due to the instruction given to the household, e.g. different costs between using the instructed woody biomass and biomass residues;


2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on how the sampling has been conducted in accordance with the sampling plan in the registered PDD as per PS version 09.0 paragraph 249.
Issue: The PP/DOE is requested to substantiate how the 90/10 sampling precision has been met. The attached KPT report shows two precision values, i.e. 4.1% and 12.6% whereas the DOE has not provided the verification and justification.

3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a comparison of the actual CERs claimed in the monitoring period with the estimate in the PDD, and explanation on any significant increase, including all information (i.e. data or parameters) that is different from that stated in the registered PDD) as per PS version 09.0 paragraphs 256 and 257.
Issue: The PP/DOE has explained that the actual emission reduction is higher than estimates in the PDD because of two reasons. The second reason is: the proportion of stoves operating (i.e. 87.22%) was higher than forecast in the PDD. However, it is observed that the proportion of operating stoves in the PDD is 90% as per the registered PDD (page 25). Please further clarify.