05:26 18 Jul 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The validation opinion does not contain a confirmation that the changes do not require prior approval of the Board and the provisions of Appendix 1 of Project Standard apply to those corrections
Issue: Information is required on whether the change of build margin emission factor is related to the changes specified in Appendix 1 to the Project Standard, noticing that there is no change being made to the revised PDD whereas the DOE has stated a change made to the PDD.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters used to calculate baseline, project and leakage emissions as well as other parameters required by the applied methodology and the registered monitoring plan. (PS v1, para 191, 192 (a)(c )(d)(e)(f))
Issue: The Monitoring Plan (page 24) requires that EFBM,y, Fi,y, COEFi, NCVi and GENy must be monitored and therefore updated annually. The methodology (page 9) requires the annual update ex-post of Build Margin emission factor in option 2 as it was selected by the PP according to page 12 of the PDD. However, neither the monitoring report nor the CER spreadsheet includes the necessary information on how the Build Margin emission factor was monitored and updated as per the monitoring plan requirement. Information is required including the selected vintage data based on which the Build Margin emission factor was calculated.
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the equipment used to monitor each parameter including details on accuracy class and calibration information (frequency, dates of calibration and validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (PS v1, para 192 (b))
Issue: The validity period of the 3 main meters as it is stated in MR page 11 does not cover the 1st monitoring period (from 01/07/2011 to 31/03/2012). Calibration information is requested for the complete monitoring period.
4: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports (VVS v2, para 236, 284 (e)).
Issue: The verification report does not list all the parameters required by the monitoring plan (e.g. EFBM,y, Fi,y, COEFi, NCVi and GENy, page 24 of PDD) and does not provide the statement on how the DOE verify the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) of aforementioned parameters. Information is required.
1: Scope: The validation opinion does not contain a confirmation that the changes do not require prior approval of the Board and the provisions of Appendix 1 of Project Standard apply to those corrections
Issue: Information is required on whether the change of build margin emission factor is related to the changes specified in Appendix 1 to the Project Standard, noticing that there is no change being made to the revised PDD whereas the DOE has stated a change made to the PDD.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters used to calculate baseline, project and leakage emissions as well as other parameters required by the applied methodology and the registered monitoring plan. (PS v1, para 191, 192 (a)(c )(d)(e)(f))
Issue: The Monitoring Plan (page 24) requires that EFBM,y, Fi,y, COEFi, NCVi and GENy must be monitored and therefore updated annually. The methodology (page 9) requires the annual update ex-post of Build Margin emission factor in option 2 as it was selected by the PP according to page 12 of the PDD. However, neither the monitoring report nor the CER spreadsheet includes the necessary information on how the Build Margin emission factor was monitored and updated as per the monitoring plan requirement. Information is required including the selected vintage data based on which the Build Margin emission factor was calculated.
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the equipment used to monitor each parameter including details on accuracy class and calibration information (frequency, dates of calibration and validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (PS v1, para 192 (b))
Issue: The validity period of the 3 main meters as it is stated in MR page 11 does not cover the 1st monitoring period (from 01/07/2011 to 31/03/2012). Calibration information is requested for the complete monitoring period.
4: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports (VVS v2, para 236, 284 (e)).
Issue: The verification report does not list all the parameters required by the monitoring plan (e.g. EFBM,y, Fi,y, COEFi, NCVi and GENy, page 24 of PDD) and does not provide the statement on how the DOE verify the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) of aforementioned parameters. Information is required.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: