Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
Scope: The verification and certification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 393 and 409 (e).
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it verified parameter Wsite, in particular:
(a) as the parameter is determined annually by sampling survey, the DOE needs to explain why the value of the parameter for year 2013 in this monitoring period is not the same as the value for year 2013 for the previous monitoring period;
(b) how it concluded that the confidence of 90% and precision of 10% have been achieved (Verification Report page 30-31) in line with the Standard for Sampling and surveys for CDM project activities and programme of activities, version 04.1 paragraph 22(a). In doing so, the DOE is also requested to mention what the actual precision is. Section D.3 of the monitoring report has provided the sample size calculation that takes into account 90/10 confidence/precision level. However it has not shown whether the result of the sampling has met the required 90/10 confidence/precision level. Please see Appendix 4 of Guideline for Sampling and surveys for CDM project activities and programmes of activities version 03.0 for the calculation of reliability.