Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (PS v7 para 250)
Issue: The MR (pg. 7) and the VR (pg. 10) have provided the monitoring diagram which indicates that the proposed project activity is connected together with other two projects (project 1_ 49.5 MW and project 2_ xx MW). The data generated from the three projects is used to estimate the emission reductions from the proposed project activity. However, the details (i.e. types of the other project activities, names and capacity for project 2) have not been provided.

2: Scope: The verification report shall contain a confirmation that appropriate methods and formulae for calculating baseline
emissions, project emissions and leakage have been followed. (VVS v7, para 291 (c))
Issue: The MR (pg. 10) has reported monitored values for EGimport, M1 (331.584 MWh), EGimport, M2 (217.504 MWh), and EGimport, M3 (163.968 MWh). A value of 140 MWh, which is attributable to the electricity imports by the proposed project activity, has been calculated based on equation B (MR_ section E) and used to calculate the baseline emissions. It is noted that the monitored value (EGimport, M3 - 163.968 MWh) is higher than the calculated value (140 MWh). The DOE is requested to report how it assessed the conservativeness of the approach (Equation B) used to calculate the baseline emissions.