04:17 24 Apr 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The “Data” sheet of the submitted spreadsheet shows that the maximum accuracy of the meter has been applied for the electricity generation and consumption for the month of Feb in 2019 and 2020. However, the DOE did not provide any verification opinion on the delayed calibration of the meters. Therefore, the DOE is required to provide further information on how it verified the calibration of the meter as per the para. 366 of VVS for PA v0.3.0
2: The DOE stated that the site visit for this project activity was not conducted due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the site visit cannot be postponed to a later date. The DOE is required to provide further information as per the para 26 of EB 106 meeting report since it did not provide a proper justification as to why the site visits cannot be postponed, including the demonstration of a significant impact of delaying the site visits on the DOE or project participants (e.g. commitment/ timeline as per the validation or verification contract, CER delivery commitment by project
participants), with reliance on applicable force majeure provisions in the
validation or verification contracts as per the para 26(b) of EB 106 meeting report.
1: The “Data” sheet of the submitted spreadsheet shows that the maximum accuracy of the meter has been applied for the electricity generation and consumption for the month of Feb in 2019 and 2020. However, the DOE did not provide any verification opinion on the delayed calibration of the meters. Therefore, the DOE is required to provide further information on how it verified the calibration of the meter as per the para. 366 of VVS for PA v0.3.0
2: The DOE stated that the site visit for this project activity was not conducted due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the site visit cannot be postponed to a later date. The DOE is required to provide further information as per the para 26 of EB 106 meeting report since it did not provide a proper justification as to why the site visits cannot be postponed, including the demonstration of a significant impact of delaying the site visits on the DOE or project participants (e.g. commitment/ timeline as per the validation or verification contract, CER delivery commitment by project
participants), with reliance on applicable force majeure provisions in the
validation or verification contracts as per the para 26(b) of EB 106 meeting report.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: