16:13 05 Feb 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The revised PDD does not contain a description of the corrections to project information and specify how it is in accordance with Appendix 1 of the Project Standard? (PS v1, para 209)
Issue: The MR contains information on the change/addition of new lots in the project activity that contributed to higher emission reductions than the estimated in the PDD. However, a revised PDD with the correct number of estimated ERs (calculated with the correct number of lots) has not been submitted.
2: Scope: The validation opinion does not contain a confirmation that the changes do not require prior approval of the Board and the provisions of Appendix 1 of Project Standard apply to those corrections
Issue: The VR states "By comparing the actual ER claimed in this monitoring period with the estimate in the registered PDD. The actual result is around 14.9 % higher than what is stated in the PDD. The estimation in the PDD did not include several lots that are corresponding to this monitoring period; this correction is the main reason for the increment of ER. The exclusion of these lots during the renewable of the crediting period does not affect the definition neither the implementation of the project." However, a validation opinion assessing the post-registration change of estimated ERs in the PDD (calculated with the correct number of lots) has not been submitted.
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (PS v1 para 188 (a)(b)(c))
Issue: The monitoring report, section B.1 does not contain complete information about the implementation status of the project, specifically on the addition of some lots (additional animals in the project activity) as stated in section E.6.
4: Scope: The verification report does not contain an statement that identifies any changes to the registered PDD and if applicable, the date of approval by the Board. (VVS v2, para 284 (f))
Issue: The verification report states that the PDD estimations did not include several lots (animals in barns), currently included in the project activity and the omission of those lots resulted in lower ER estimations in the PDD. The DOE did not include an assessment on those post registration changes in line with PS Appendix 1 and VVS paragraphs 284 and 249. Therefore, a revised PDD with the corrected number of ERs and validation opinion of those post-registration changes is requested.
1: Scope: The revised PDD does not contain a description of the corrections to project information and specify how it is in accordance with Appendix 1 of the Project Standard? (PS v1, para 209)
Issue: The MR contains information on the change/addition of new lots in the project activity that contributed to higher emission reductions than the estimated in the PDD. However, a revised PDD with the correct number of estimated ERs (calculated with the correct number of lots) has not been submitted.
2: Scope: The validation opinion does not contain a confirmation that the changes do not require prior approval of the Board and the provisions of Appendix 1 of Project Standard apply to those corrections
Issue: The VR states "By comparing the actual ER claimed in this monitoring period with the estimate in the registered PDD. The actual result is around 14.9 % higher than what is stated in the PDD. The estimation in the PDD did not include several lots that are corresponding to this monitoring period; this correction is the main reason for the increment of ER. The exclusion of these lots during the renewable of the crediting period does not affect the definition neither the implementation of the project." However, a validation opinion assessing the post-registration change of estimated ERs in the PDD (calculated with the correct number of lots) has not been submitted.
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (PS v1 para 188 (a)(b)(c))
Issue: The monitoring report, section B.1 does not contain complete information about the implementation status of the project, specifically on the addition of some lots (additional animals in the project activity) as stated in section E.6.
4: Scope: The verification report does not contain an statement that identifies any changes to the registered PDD and if applicable, the date of approval by the Board. (VVS v2, para 284 (f))
Issue: The verification report states that the PDD estimations did not include several lots (animals in barns), currently included in the project activity and the omission of those lots resulted in lower ER estimations in the PDD. The DOE did not include an assessment on those post registration changes in line with PS Appendix 1 and VVS paragraphs 284 and 249. Therefore, a revised PDD with the corrected number of ERs and validation opinion of those post-registration changes is requested.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: