12:43 06 Jun 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: the monitoring report does not contain a description of the organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system and a line diagram showing all relevant monitoring points.
2: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain all parameters required to be monitored and/or reported at the intervals required by the monitoring plan and the applied methodology?
Issue: the spreadsheet does not contain monitored parameters and calculation relevant to the project emissions from flaring of the residual gas stream as per Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane
3: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain explanation with regard to application of formulae in the spreadsheet. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (b) (iii)).
Issue: the spreadsheet does not contain explanation about the formulae used for the application of instrumental errors as per EB52 Annex 60 during periods when calibration delays occurred.
4: Scope: The verification report does not contain information on all CARs, CLs and FARs and/or provide an assessment and close out of any CARs, CLs or FARs issued. (VVM v.1.2 para 192, 194)
Issue: with reference to CAR 10 and the calibration delays addressed thereby, it is not clear how the DOE verified compliance with the requirement of EB52 Annex 60 for each delayed calibration and what are the resulting changes in the monitoring report and ER calculation spreadsheet.
5: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: calibration delays are observed for the following instruments / parameters ID: i) POME flowmeter / ID 1; ii) Biogas flowmeter / ID 20; iii) Biogas flowmeter / ID 18; iv) Biogas flowmeter / ID 28; v) Steam flowmeter / ID 9; vi) POME flowmeter / ID14; kWh meter / ID 12. It is not clear in the Verification Report how the DOE has assessed compliance with EB52 Annex 60 (para 4 and 5) for each delayed calibration.
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: the monitoring report does not contain a description of the organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system and a line diagram showing all relevant monitoring points.
2: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain all parameters required to be monitored and/or reported at the intervals required by the monitoring plan and the applied methodology?
Issue: the spreadsheet does not contain monitored parameters and calculation relevant to the project emissions from flaring of the residual gas stream as per Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane
3: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain explanation with regard to application of formulae in the spreadsheet. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (b) (iii)).
Issue: the spreadsheet does not contain explanation about the formulae used for the application of instrumental errors as per EB52 Annex 60 during periods when calibration delays occurred.
4: Scope: The verification report does not contain information on all CARs, CLs and FARs and/or provide an assessment and close out of any CARs, CLs or FARs issued. (VVM v.1.2 para 192, 194)
Issue: with reference to CAR 10 and the calibration delays addressed thereby, it is not clear how the DOE verified compliance with the requirement of EB52 Annex 60 for each delayed calibration and what are the resulting changes in the monitoring report and ER calculation spreadsheet.
5: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: calibration delays are observed for the following instruments / parameters ID: i) POME flowmeter / ID 1; ii) Biogas flowmeter / ID 20; iii) Biogas flowmeter / ID 18; iv) Biogas flowmeter / ID 28; v) Steam flowmeter / ID 9; vi) POME flowmeter / ID14; kWh meter / ID 12. It is not clear in the Verification Report how the DOE has assessed compliance with EB52 Annex 60 (para 4 and 5) for each delayed calibration.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: