Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue:The PP/DOE is requested to provide an explanation on Annex 1 (Single Line Diagram) in the Monitoring Report with clearly denoting the main metering points. In doing so the PP/DOE should also clearly indicate the impact of the 12 MW power plant and its relevance to the project activity.

2: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analyses. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (a) and (b))
Issue:The PDD (Section D.3) and the Monitoring Report (Section C and D.2) states that the electricity supplied to third parties will be crossed checked with sales receipts and accounts. However there is no reference of the same in the Verification Report. Moreover it is not clear how the DOE cross checked the electricity generation records with the DCS as there is no mention of the same in the Verification Report. The DOE is requested to incorporate the details of the cross checking mechanism for better clarity.Further the PP/DOE shall also clarify the term “third party”.