Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports (VVS v2, para 236, 284 (e)).
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it concluded the calculation of EFgrid,CM,y, in particular EFsimple,OM,y, is in line with the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system version 3. For ex-post option of simple OM, the emission factor is determined for the year in which the project activity displaces grid electricity (Tool page 10). However, the simple OM was calculated based on three years data.

2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan (VVS v2, para 243)
Issue: As per the monitoring plan, the frequency of the calibration is according to the national standard (PDD page 21). However, the monitoring and verification reports have not provided the national standard used for calibration. The DOE is requested to:
(a) Clarify why international standard "Norme Internationale CEI IEC- International Standard 62053-21 dated in Jan. 2003" is used to justify the calibration frequency;
(b) Provide the calibration frequency as per the applicable standard.