Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue:
1. The DOE shall clarify how the following changes from the registered PDD have been considered as closed in CL1 and CL 3 in accordance with para 197 of VVM version 1.2:
a). Increase of plant’s installed capacity from 9.73 MW to 9.85 MW and turbine capacity from 2*4.68 to 2*4.925
b). Modification in length of transmission line from 11 km to 13.3 km (ref. page 12 of verification report).
c). Change in project participant's name from EDEMET and EDECHI to Energia y Servicios de Panama S.A. (ESEPSA)
2. The DOE shall clarify whether the EDECHI distribution system is part of the grid or not to which Caldera electrical substation is connected (i.e. electricity was exported to the EDICHI distribution system from April 2009 to October 2009).

2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue:
1. The DOE is requested to clarify how it has verified the calibration frequency of the energy meter and the validity of the calibration tests performed by the calibration agency. Also, the MR shall contain all the calibration details in line with EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34.
2. Please clarify the internal procedures on the calibrations performed as referred on page 15 of the verification report.