09:59 28 Dec 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue:
a) The verification report states that the clinker production is measured by 1) multiplying the kiln feed by the CK factor and; 2) weight scales in lines 1, 2 and 3 after the clinker cooler. The DOE is requested to provide further verification opinion on the data which has been used in the emission reduction calculation out of these two measurement methods. Furthermore, please clarify the cross checking of the clinker inventories through an external party given that, as per the MR, it has been done once in two months from Feb 2011 to May 2011 and once in a month from June 2011 onwards whereas it is required to be once in a month as per the registered monitoring plan.
b) The DOE is requested to provide further verificaiton opinion on the parameters applicable to rule out leakage as per approach L1 and L2 in line with the registered PDD (section B.6.1, page 50) and monitoring methodology, ACM 0003 version 07. In doing so, the DOE shall clarify whether any independent survey or biomass assessment study was carried out by the PP in line with the registered PDD.
c) The DOE is requested to provide futher verification opinion on how the mazout has been measured in line with the registered PDD given that the MR states it was measured by the flow meters whereas the verification report states mazout is measured using the two truck scales of the plant and using the stock changes monthly.
2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue:
a) The DOE is requested to verify the calibration dates of all the equipments used to monitor parameters such as quantity of alternative fuel (AF) and fossil fuel (FF), NCV of AF and FF, electricity consumption, clinker produciton as mentioned in the MR in line with the calibration requirements of the registered PDD. In doing so, please clarify any gap in the calibration in accordance with EB 52 Annex 60.
b) The DOE is requested to verify the NCV of alternative or less carbon intensive fuel types k (NCVk,y) which was measured by an external laboratory before 21.03.2011 as mentioned in the MR. Furthermore, please clarify whether NCV is obtained for each fuel delivery as required by ACM 0003 version 07 (option b, where the measurements are done by the PP).
1: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue:
a) The verification report states that the clinker production is measured by 1) multiplying the kiln feed by the CK factor and; 2) weight scales in lines 1, 2 and 3 after the clinker cooler. The DOE is requested to provide further verification opinion on the data which has been used in the emission reduction calculation out of these two measurement methods. Furthermore, please clarify the cross checking of the clinker inventories through an external party given that, as per the MR, it has been done once in two months from Feb 2011 to May 2011 and once in a month from June 2011 onwards whereas it is required to be once in a month as per the registered monitoring plan.
b) The DOE is requested to provide further verificaiton opinion on the parameters applicable to rule out leakage as per approach L1 and L2 in line with the registered PDD (section B.6.1, page 50) and monitoring methodology, ACM 0003 version 07. In doing so, the DOE shall clarify whether any independent survey or biomass assessment study was carried out by the PP in line with the registered PDD.
c) The DOE is requested to provide futher verification opinion on how the mazout has been measured in line with the registered PDD given that the MR states it was measured by the flow meters whereas the verification report states mazout is measured using the two truck scales of the plant and using the stock changes monthly.
2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue:
a) The DOE is requested to verify the calibration dates of all the equipments used to monitor parameters such as quantity of alternative fuel (AF) and fossil fuel (FF), NCV of AF and FF, electricity consumption, clinker produciton as mentioned in the MR in line with the calibration requirements of the registered PDD. In doing so, please clarify any gap in the calibration in accordance with EB 52 Annex 60.
b) The DOE is requested to verify the NCV of alternative or less carbon intensive fuel types k (NCVk,y) which was measured by an external laboratory before 21.03.2011 as mentioned in the MR. Furthermore, please clarify whether NCV is obtained for each fuel delivery as required by ACM 0003 version 07 (option b, where the measurements are done by the PP).
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: