04:34 04 Jan 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1:
The monitoring report does not provide a line diagram showing all the relevant monitoring points as per paragraph 258 of the CDM project standard for project activities, version 02.0.
2:
The verification report page 15 confirms that, for the parameter EGBL,y,Rajasthan, the value of net electricity supplied from JMR and invoices raised was found the same to be correct. However, the spreadsheet (worksheet “Rathkuriya”) shows that the net export value per invoice for Feb 2016, Dec 2016, Aug 2017 and Jan 2019 is lower than the JMR value. The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the JMR value used for ER calculation for these months considering the value in the invoice is lower. Refer to paragraphs 361(e) and 373 (b) of VVS for PA, version 02.0.
3:
This verification covers the first monitoring period for the project activity; however, there is no information provided in the verification report (e.g. not applicable reported in the verification report section E.10) on how the DOE took due account of all authentic and relevant comments in the verification as per paragraphs 391 and 392 of the CDM VVS for PA, version 02.0.
1:
The monitoring report does not provide a line diagram showing all the relevant monitoring points as per paragraph 258 of the CDM project standard for project activities, version 02.0.
2:
The verification report page 15 confirms that, for the parameter EGBL,y,Rajasthan, the value of net electricity supplied from JMR and invoices raised was found the same to be correct. However, the spreadsheet (worksheet “Rathkuriya”) shows that the net export value per invoice for Feb 2016, Dec 2016, Aug 2017 and Jan 2019 is lower than the JMR value. The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the JMR value used for ER calculation for these months considering the value in the invoice is lower. Refer to paragraphs 361(e) and 373 (b) of VVS for PA, version 02.0.
3:
This verification covers the first monitoring period for the project activity; however, there is no information provided in the verification report (e.g. not applicable reported in the verification report section E.10) on how the DOE took due account of all authentic and relevant comments in the verification as per paragraphs 391 and 392 of the CDM VVS for PA, version 02.0.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: