Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue:
The monitoring report does not contain any information on calibration of monitoring instruments used during the baseline campaign.
The project participant is requested to provide such information.

2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions, leakage (if any), and/or emission reductions, including reference to formula and methods used. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (vii))
Issue:
The monitoring report does not contain reference to the formula used to correct VSG to take care of the difference in the values of the stack diameter.
The project participant is requested to provide information on the rationale together with a formula describing the correction.

3: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain explanation with regard to application of formulae in the spreadsheet. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (b) (iii)).
Issue:
The spreadsheet does not contain any explanation with regards to the formula used to correct the values of NAP and VSG for the historical campaigns, the baseline campaign and the project campaigns. The project participant is requested to add the relevant information.

4: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue:
As per the monitoring report, the calibration of the instruments used to monitor oxidation temperature, pressure, ammonia flow rate and air flow rate does not cover the period between 7 September 2010 and 14 September 2010. However, the verification report (section 3.7) refers to a delay that would have occured during the historical campaign, between 7 september 2009 and 15 september 2009. The DOE is requested to clarify this inconsistency.

5: Scope: The verification report does not contain information on all CARs, CLs and FARs and/or provide an assessment and close out of any CARs, CLs or FARs issued. (VVM v.1.2 para 192, 194)
Issue:
In the verification report, the answer to CL2 does not provide any information on the rationale and on how the correction factor is used to correct the values of VSGBC and VSG. The DOE is requested to provide the relevant information.

6: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue:
The verification report (page 13) states that the impact of the delayed calibration is explained in section 3.6. However section 3.6 does not contain the information. Information about the delay is in section 3.7. The DOE is requested to revise this inconsistency.