02:11 05 Feb 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
The monitoring report (page 22) states that “the period considered does not have valid thermocouple certificates since there was no calibration nor substitution of the equipment during the referred period. Hence, a discount of 1.5ºC (equal to the accuracy of equipment) was applied for the temperature data measured by ALUTAL thermocouple”. However, the verification report does not contain information regarding the calibration being implemented after the monitoring period in consideration, nor an assessment on whether the results of the delayed calibration show any errors in the measuring equipment, or if the error is smaller than the maximum permissible error. Please refer to VVS for project activities v01, paragraphs 369 and 371.
The monitoring report (page 22) states that “the period considered does not have valid thermocouple certificates since there was no calibration nor substitution of the equipment during the referred period. Hence, a discount of 1.5ºC (equal to the accuracy of equipment) was applied for the temperature data measured by ALUTAL thermocouple”. However, the verification report does not contain information regarding the calibration being implemented after the monitoring period in consideration, nor an assessment on whether the results of the delayed calibration show any errors in the measuring equipment, or if the error is smaller than the maximum permissible error. Please refer to VVS for project activities v01, paragraphs 369 and 371.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: