10:10 25 Jun 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters. (EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: The monitoring report does not report the value of the monitored parameters throughout the monitoring period.
2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue: The applied methodology requires calculating the energy savings using the metered energy. However, this parameter is not included in the registered monitoring plan and the monitoring report.
3: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (c) & 221 (h))
Issue: The DOE is required to further explain how it verified that: (1) the project emissions in the spreadsheet are calculated in accordance with the equations in the PDD (page 21); (2) the emission reduction equations prescribed in the PDD and the MR are correct as the calculation does not result in the emission reductions due to energy efficiency measure as the baseline emissions are calculated based on the historical figure of the electricity generation, not the electricity generation during the project activity.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: For parameter Gross Quantity of electricity generated, the DOE mentions that the maximum correction factor has been applied in line with EB52 Annex 60. However, it is not clear how this has complied with the EB52 Annex 60 paragraph 4 as the result of the delayed calibrations are not presented. Furthermore, the delayed period has also not been presented.
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters. (EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: The monitoring report does not report the value of the monitored parameters throughout the monitoring period.
2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue: The applied methodology requires calculating the energy savings using the metered energy. However, this parameter is not included in the registered monitoring plan and the monitoring report.
3: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (c) & 221 (h))
Issue: The DOE is required to further explain how it verified that: (1) the project emissions in the spreadsheet are calculated in accordance with the equations in the PDD (page 21); (2) the emission reduction equations prescribed in the PDD and the MR are correct as the calculation does not result in the emission reductions due to energy efficiency measure as the baseline emissions are calculated based on the historical figure of the electricity generation, not the electricity generation during the project activity.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: For parameter Gross Quantity of electricity generated, the DOE mentions that the maximum correction factor has been applied in line with EB52 Annex 60. However, it is not clear how this has complied with the EB52 Annex 60 paragraph 4 as the result of the delayed calibrations are not presented. Furthermore, the delayed period has also not been presented.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: