Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The revised PDD does not contain a description of the nature and extent of the proposed or actual changes to the project design of a registered project activity (PS v1, para 218 (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
Issue: The PDD (page 2) states "It is projected to have a nominal installed capacity of 520 kW" and the other page (page 4) of the PDD states "Installed capacity: 660 kVA with 0.8 power factor (660 * 0.8 = 528 kW)". The PP is required to correct the inconsistency of the installed capacity in the revised PDD.

2: Scope: The validation opinion does not describe the nature and extent of the actual changes, determine whether this description accurately reflects the implementation, operation and monitoring of the modified project activity (VVS v.2 para 271)
Issue: The validation opinion (page 4) clearly states that 1040MWh of the average of the historical electricity delivered by the existing facility to the grid form 2000 to 2004 was deducted in the calculation of the emission reduction. However, this information is not clearly presented in the revised PDD.

3: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan (VVS v2, para 243)
Issue: The verification report (page 11) states that "Due to the delayed calibration for the readings of the Elster meter, the maximum permissible error of 0.2% was applied from January to April". However, the spreadsheet does not show how the maximum error was applied.