19:36 28 Mar 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
Scope: The verification report does not describe the implementation status of the project. (For project activities that consist of more than one site, the report shall clearly describe the status of implementation and starting date of operation for each site. For CDM project activities with phased implementation, the report shall state the progress of the proposed CDM project activity achieved in each phase under verification). (VVS v2, para 228 (a))
Scope: The verification report does not describe the reasons for the phased-implementation delay and/or does not present the expected implementation dates. (VVS v2, para 228 (a))
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it confirmed that the implementation of the project activity is in accordance with the registered PDD as: (i) there has been an increase of the length of the collection system which was not planned in the PDD; (ii) there has been other improvements at the landfill (i.e. optimization of waste disposal, drainage systems, daily covering, equipment and workforce) which were not planned in the PDD; (iii) the landfill still receives waste until 2014 whereas the registered PDD considers the landfill would only receive waste until 2010. In doing so, the DOE is also requested to explain why the aforementioned changes are not considered as changes to the project design.
Scope: The verification report does not describe the implementation status of the project. (For project activities that consist of more than one site, the report shall clearly describe the status of implementation and starting date of operation for each site. For CDM project activities with phased implementation, the report shall state the progress of the proposed CDM project activity achieved in each phase under verification). (VVS v2, para 228 (a))
Scope: The verification report does not describe the reasons for the phased-implementation delay and/or does not present the expected implementation dates. (VVS v2, para 228 (a))
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it confirmed that the implementation of the project activity is in accordance with the registered PDD as: (i) there has been an increase of the length of the collection system which was not planned in the PDD; (ii) there has been other improvements at the landfill (i.e. optimization of waste disposal, drainage systems, daily covering, equipment and workforce) which were not planned in the PDD; (iii) the landfill still receives waste until 2014 whereas the registered PDD considers the landfill would only receive waste until 2010. In doing so, the DOE is also requested to explain why the aforementioned changes are not considered as changes to the project design.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: