12:59 05 Feb 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters used to calculate baseline, project and leakage emissions as well as other parameters required by the applied methodology and the registered monitoring plan. (PS v1, para 191, 192 (a)(c )(d)(e)(f))
Issue: The Registered monitoring plan page 28 states that the parameter FCi,y refers to the use of fossil fuel for start up, thus the DOE/PP are requested to clarify if there was any use of coal for purposes of start- up during this monitoring period
2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVS v2 para 235)
Issue: The DOE is requested to further substantiate: (a) the difference of value of parameter Qbiomass,y (Procured) and Qbiomass,y (Consumed) in the spreadsheet, and the use of Qbiomass,y (Consumed) for the emission reductions calculation; (b) the use of procurement data for parameter FCdiesel,j,y being conservative assumption (Verification Report page 18), considering for months of May 2011, July 2011, October 2011, December 2011, February 2012 and March 2012, lower values are used in the project emissions calculation, hence not conservative. Moreover, there is a discrepancy in the annual value for FCdiesel,j,y used in the calculation of the Emission reductions, as the verification report page 18 declares that the consumed value (40,372 Litres) is used whereas the spreadsheet uses the procured value (40,400 litres).
3: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVS v2, para 246 (d))
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it has verified the appropriateness of the assumptions, in line with the VVS version 03.0 paragraph 245 (d), considering the methodology the applied methodology paragraph 19 requires the SFC of fossil fuel to be determined ex-ante, whereas the PDD does not contain any SFC of coal, which was also used in during this monitoring period
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters used to calculate baseline, project and leakage emissions as well as other parameters required by the applied methodology and the registered monitoring plan. (PS v1, para 191, 192 (a)(c )(d)(e)(f))
Issue: The Registered monitoring plan page 28 states that the parameter FCi,y refers to the use of fossil fuel for start up, thus the DOE/PP are requested to clarify if there was any use of coal for purposes of start- up during this monitoring period
2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVS v2 para 235)
Issue: The DOE is requested to further substantiate: (a) the difference of value of parameter Qbiomass,y (Procured) and Qbiomass,y (Consumed) in the spreadsheet, and the use of Qbiomass,y (Consumed) for the emission reductions calculation; (b) the use of procurement data for parameter FCdiesel,j,y being conservative assumption (Verification Report page 18), considering for months of May 2011, July 2011, October 2011, December 2011, February 2012 and March 2012, lower values are used in the project emissions calculation, hence not conservative. Moreover, there is a discrepancy in the annual value for FCdiesel,j,y used in the calculation of the Emission reductions, as the verification report page 18 declares that the consumed value (40,372 Litres) is used whereas the spreadsheet uses the procured value (40,400 litres).
3: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVS v2, para 246 (d))
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it has verified the appropriateness of the assumptions, in line with the VVS version 03.0 paragraph 245 (d), considering the methodology the applied methodology paragraph 19 requires the SFC of fossil fuel to be determined ex-ante, whereas the PDD does not contain any SFC of coal, which was also used in during this monitoring period
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: