03:24 04 Jan 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
It is noted from the registered monitoring plan and monitoring report that frequency of calibration of the energy meters is once in a year. Further, it is also noted that, no calibration certificates were provided for the duration from November 2012 up to June 2016. Therefore, as per requirement under paragraph 366 of the CDM VVS for project activities, version 3.0, the DOE shall require confirming how project participant has addressed the error due to delayed calibration.
Review of excel file submitted together with the issuance request indicate the error factor was not considered in calculation of electricity export from and electricity import to the project activity. For example, please refer to cell F8 to F55 and cells H8 to H55 under the worksheet 'SPV1(TVSPL)' of the associated excel file. Hence it is not clear how the DOE has verified that the approach applied by the project participant is in-line with the requirements of paragraph 366 and 367 of CDM VVS for project activities, version 3.0.
Therefore, as per requirements under paragraph 366 and 367 of the CDM VVS for project activities, version 3.0, the DOE is requested to confirm how it has verified that the emission reductions are calculated applying the maximum permissible error due to delayed calibration.
It is noted from the registered monitoring plan and monitoring report that frequency of calibration of the energy meters is once in a year. Further, it is also noted that, no calibration certificates were provided for the duration from November 2012 up to June 2016. Therefore, as per requirement under paragraph 366 of the CDM VVS for project activities, version 3.0, the DOE shall require confirming how project participant has addressed the error due to delayed calibration.
Review of excel file submitted together with the issuance request indicate the error factor was not considered in calculation of electricity export from and electricity import to the project activity. For example, please refer to cell F8 to F55 and cells H8 to H55 under the worksheet 'SPV1(TVSPL)' of the associated excel file. Hence it is not clear how the DOE has verified that the approach applied by the project participant is in-line with the requirements of paragraph 366 and 367 of CDM VVS for project activities, version 3.0.
Therefore, as per requirements under paragraph 366 and 367 of the CDM VVS for project activities, version 3.0, the DOE is requested to confirm how it has verified that the emission reductions are calculated applying the maximum permissible error due to delayed calibration.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: