Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters. (EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue:
According to methodology AM0028 Version 01, the Hydrocarbon density should be monitored and the name of the parameter is (rho)HC. The project participant is also requested to use the tag number of the parameters given in the methodology for all the parameters listed in the monitoring report.

2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue:
The project participant is requested to provide information on the delay of the AST test and the result of this test in section D.2 for the Outlet Analyzer. The project participant is also requested to provide the previous date of AST Test for the inlet analyzer and the results of the tests. Some dates are provided in section D.2 but it is not clear what they refer to. The project participant is requested to clearly indicate the dates of calibration and validity of each equipment used for the monitoring of the parameters.

3: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain the formulae of calculation that are shown in the spreadsheet cells whenever possible. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (b) (ii)).
Issue:
The spreadsheet dos not include a formulae that would allow to check that the parameters Tg,d or Pg,d are within the operating conditions defined in the PDD. The project participant is requested to provide this information in the spreadsheet.

4: Scope: The verification report does not contain reference to the deviation requested and approved by the Executive Board for the monitoring period in consideration prior to submitting request for issuance. (VVM v.1.2 para 203)
Issue:
The monitoring report (page 12) states that "Request for deviation was applied and accepted by the UNFCCC office in September 2008, reference number I-DEV0150, submitted 21 August 2008, by SGS". However the Verification report states (p14) that "Neither a revision nor a deviation to the monitoring plan has been requested to the CDM Executive Board". The DOE is requested to clarify this inconsistency.

5: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan (VVM v.1.2 para 206)named
Issue:
The notation used for the Hydrocarbon density should be "ρHC" as per the methodology. However the parameter is named "HC" in the verification report. The DOE is requested to correct this inconsistency.