Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: the PP is requested to include a description of the electricity meters used to monitor the electricity exported by Heiyupao II project to the grid, a description of the QA/QC procedures, the data collection procedures and the roles and responsibilities of the personnel involved in the monitoring of this parameter.

The PP is also requested to include a diagram in the Monitoring Report indicating all relevant monitoring points.

2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters. (EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: the PP is requested to provide the monitored data of all parameters involved in the calculation of emission reductions, in particular, the monitored values of EG export main,y (electricity exported to the grid measured by the main meter and backup meter) & EG export ii,y (electricity exported to the grid by Heiyupao II project).

3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: the PP is requested to include the calibration details of all monitoring instruments involved in the monitoring of the project activity. In particular, the monitoring requirements and details of the electricity meters installed in the 35 kV transmission line of Heiyupao II project.

4: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue: In particular, the DOE is requested to indicate how the parameter EG export,ii,y was verified. In doing this, the DOE shall also provide details on how it verified that the monitoring equipment used for this parameter is in compliance with the calibration and accuracy requirements in the monitoring plan in the PDD.

5: Scope: The verification report does not state how the DOE verified the information flow for the listed parameters. (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the information flow for the parameter "electricity exported by HII project to the grid".
In doing this, the DOE is requested to explain how it verified that the monitoring plan in the registered PDD is in accordance with the monitoring methodology and does reflect the actual monitoring activity.

6: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: the DOE is requested to provide an assessment of the calibration details of each monitoring equipment used for monitoring.