Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVS v.2 para 232)
Issue: The DOE is requested to further explain how it confirmed the monitoring plan in the registered PDD is in accordance with the applied methodology, as the monitoring plan will calculate the parameter daily consumption of combustion air in primary reformer (furnace), whereas the methodology requires the metering the energy use of the industrial facility, processes or the equipment affected by the project activity. Furthermore, the monitoring report shows that Excess Air on Dry Basis (including the oxygen) is calculated based on the Flue gas generated on wet basis by complete combustion (FLG). However, as shown in page 25 of the monitoring report, the FLG does not contain O2.

2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVS v2 para 235)
Issue: The DOE is requested to further substantiate how the monitoring has been in accordance with the monitoring plan as for Naphtha the analysis is given by the supplier for each incoming load, whereas the registered PDD requires that ultimate analysis of fuel in primary reformer to be recorded weekly.

3: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports (VVS v2, para 236, 284 (e)).
Issue: The Verification Report has not provided any information with regard to the use of one value of C/H ratio in Naphtha throughout the monitoring period, considering that the registered PDD requires the ultimate analysis to be recorded weekly.

4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan (VVS v2, para 243)
Issue: (a) Section 3.6 of the Verification Report states that the meters for the following parameters are calibrated by master calibrators that are calibrated annually: Quantity of fuel consumed in primary reformer (Furnace) – NG, Surplus gas, Purge gas, Tail gas, C-03 off gas, and Naphtha, Quantity of fuel consumed in super heater – Naphtha and NG, Daily consumption of combustion air in super heater, combustion air outlet temperature after APH, and combustion air inlet temperature before APH. However, the Verification Report has not shown how the master calibrators have been calibrated and whether or not the calibration covers the monitoring period; (b) Section 3.6 of the verification report reports that the calibration of measuring equipment was carried out by an accredited person or institution. The DOE is requested to further substantiate how the calibration carried out by the Instrument Department of Indo Gulf Fertilisers can be considered carried out by an accredited person or institution.