22:20 02 Aug 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: As per EB54 Annex 34, Form and guidelines for completing the monitoring report form, section C, the Monitoring Report shall "include line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points". However, Line Diagram in the Monitoring Report (on page 9) only indicates stack monitoring parameters. Process monitoring parameters such as OT, OP, AFR, AIFR, and NAP have not been included. Kindly include the required information.
2: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain the formulae of calculation that are shown in the spreadsheet cells whenever possible. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (b) (ii)).
Issue: As per EB48 Annex 68, para. 10b(ii) and 10b(iii), as well as the "Issuance - Information and Reporting Checklist", the spreadsheet must contain "formulae of calculation" and any explanation with regard to application of formulae in the spreadsheet. Furthermore, according to EB54 Annex 34, section E.1 and E.2, the monitoring report "shall include all formulae used and description to calculate the project emissions applying actual values. A table may be used and included in this monitoring report or include references to spreadsheet". However, it is noted that the submitted spreadsheet only contains the calculated results from another software. The hourly raw data (e.g. NCSG, VSG, NAP, etc.) presented in the spreadsheet are not linked with the result (e.g. "BL_Import_Access" page and "PC_Import_Access" page in spreadsheet "Deepak_WNA1_PC_Calc") by appropriate formulae.
3: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The Verification Report (on page 16 and 17) states that the latest AST was performed on 11 March 2010 whereas the same report refers to 2 March 2010 on page 26. Please rectify the inconsistency.
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: As per EB54 Annex 34, Form and guidelines for completing the monitoring report form, section C, the Monitoring Report shall "include line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points". However, Line Diagram in the Monitoring Report (on page 9) only indicates stack monitoring parameters. Process monitoring parameters such as OT, OP, AFR, AIFR, and NAP have not been included. Kindly include the required information.
2: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain the formulae of calculation that are shown in the spreadsheet cells whenever possible. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (b) (ii)).
Issue: As per EB48 Annex 68, para. 10b(ii) and 10b(iii), as well as the "Issuance - Information and Reporting Checklist", the spreadsheet must contain "formulae of calculation" and any explanation with regard to application of formulae in the spreadsheet. Furthermore, according to EB54 Annex 34, section E.1 and E.2, the monitoring report "shall include all formulae used and description to calculate the project emissions applying actual values. A table may be used and included in this monitoring report or include references to spreadsheet". However, it is noted that the submitted spreadsheet only contains the calculated results from another software. The hourly raw data (e.g. NCSG, VSG, NAP, etc.) presented in the spreadsheet are not linked with the result (e.g. "BL_Import_Access" page and "PC_Import_Access" page in spreadsheet "Deepak_WNA1_PC_Calc") by appropriate formulae.
3: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The Verification Report (on page 16 and 17) states that the latest AST was performed on 11 March 2010 whereas the same report refers to 2 March 2010 on page 26. Please rectify the inconsistency.

Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: