11:03 26 Sep 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (i) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The date of construction has not been included in the monitoring report.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain reference to the approved revised PDD, which resulted from the notification/ request for approval of changes from the project activity as described in the registered PDD sought by PP/DOE and approved by the Executive Board. (EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: The monitoring report does not contain the description on whether there is any change of the project activity.
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: the description of data collection procedures, organizational structure, emergency procedures for the monitoring system and line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points is not clear in the monitoring report.
4: Scope: The verification report does not describe the implementation status of the project. (For project activities that consist of more than one site, the report shall clearly describe the status of implementation and starting date of operation for each site. For CDM project activities with phased implementation, the report shall state the progress of the proposed CDM project activity achieved in each phase under verification). (VVM v.1.2 para 198 (a)).
Issue: The exact starting date of operation is not included in the verification report.
5: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analyses. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (a) and (b))
Issue: It is not clear how the biomass calorific value, auxilliary energy consumption and energy generated have been cross-checked.
6: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (c) & 221 (h))
Issue: There is no conclusion on the compliance with the applied methodology.
7: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: There is 4 days delay of the calibration of the weighbridge between 21/09/2007 and 25/09/2007.
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (i) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The date of construction has not been included in the monitoring report.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain reference to the approved revised PDD, which resulted from the notification/ request for approval of changes from the project activity as described in the registered PDD sought by PP/DOE and approved by the Executive Board. (EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: The monitoring report does not contain the description on whether there is any change of the project activity.
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: the description of data collection procedures, organizational structure, emergency procedures for the monitoring system and line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points is not clear in the monitoring report.
4: Scope: The verification report does not describe the implementation status of the project. (For project activities that consist of more than one site, the report shall clearly describe the status of implementation and starting date of operation for each site. For CDM project activities with phased implementation, the report shall state the progress of the proposed CDM project activity achieved in each phase under verification). (VVM v.1.2 para 198 (a)).
Issue: The exact starting date of operation is not included in the verification report.
5: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analyses. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (a) and (b))
Issue: It is not clear how the biomass calorific value, auxilliary energy consumption and energy generated have been cross-checked.
6: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (c) & 221 (h))
Issue: There is no conclusion on the compliance with the applied methodology.
7: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: There is 4 days delay of the calibration of the weighbridge between 21/09/2007 and 25/09/2007.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: