Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The validation opinion report does not provide an opinion on how the changes would impact: a) additionality; b) scale; c) applicability and application of the baseline methodology: d) compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied monitoring methodology; e) level of accuracy of the monitoring, as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 320 and 326 (c).
Issue: The DOE validated the tariff of 7.01 INR/kWh for the sale to third party by stating that "This is the applicable HT tariff thus maximum value that can be received by the PP for sale to third party." The DOE is required to provide further information on how the HT tariff is the maximum value for the sale to the third party by referencing/providing relevant/official documents.

2: Scope: The verification and certification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied approved methodology and, where applicable, the applied approved standardized baseline as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 388.
Issue: The spread sheet submitted in the request for issuance includes the monthly monitored values of "% allocated Serum" which “refers to the electricity generated by WTGs of the PP as a percentage of the electricity measured at the substation billing meters” and indicates that the meters at the substation are shared with other projects. The DOE is required to provide the further information on how it verified the monitoring as per the monitoring plan as 1) the monitoring plan (p 21-22) states that “Quantity of net electricity supplied to the grid in year y” are monitored through main and check meters at the MSEDCL sub-station and “The monthly meter reading is arrived at as the difference between the current meter reading and the previous meter reading” and 2) the actual monthly electricity import and export shown in the spreadsheet is calculated based on the meter readings at the substation and "% allocated Serum”.