Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVS v2 para 235)
Issue: For parameter Nda,y, NLT,y, Np,y and Wsite, the monitoring plan requires that the consistency between the value and indirect information (sales receipts) will be cross checked by technician. The Verification Report has not provided information how this requirement is complied with.

2: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports (VVS v2, para 236, 284 (e)).
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it has verified the following parameter:
(a) N0 (number of operational of the project activity digesters in year y), in particular how the figure of not operating digesters of 12 digesters (in 2012) and 10 digesters (in 2013) were derived. In doing so, please also explain: (i) the process flow of obtaining these figures; and (ii) if these figures were the result of the survey of 312 samples or based on the checking of the entire population of the project activity;
(b) Nda,y (Number of days animal is alive in the farm in the year y), in particular how the DOE verified that the animals were alive for 365 days in 2012 and 365 days in 2013;
(c) Np,y, in particular how the DOE verified the derivation of the value from each sampled household;
(d) Wsite, in particular how the DOE verified the derivation of the value from each sampled household;
(e) In relation to points (b), (c) (d) above and parameter NLT,y, how the DOE verified the value against indirect information as per the paragraph 25 of the applied methodology.

3: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVS v2, para 246 (d))
Issue: The DOE is requested to justify the use of GWP of CH4 of 21 tCO2e/tCH4 for emission reductions of year 2013. Please refer to EB69 Annex 3.