Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain the formulae of calculation that are shown in the spreadsheet cells whenever possible. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (b) (ii)).
Issue:
1. The DOE is requested to clarify the calculation method of the carbon content and the density in the ER spreadsheet considering that no formula has been mentioned to calculate carbon content and density using the compositional data.

2. The DOE is requested to clarify the volume of total gas measured by the totalizer C2 (for Parameter VC2), which has been used to measure the parameter starting from 03/11/2010; however, the initial reference point of the totalizer has been set from 22/12/2010 onwards.

2: Scope: The verification report does not describe the implementation status of the project. (For project activities that consist of more than one site, the report shall clearly describe the status of implementation and starting date of operation for each site. For CDM project activities with phased implementation, the report shall state the progress of the proposed CDM project activity achieved in each phase under verification). (VVM v.1.2 para 198 (a)).
Issue: The DOE is requested to further verify the implementation status of the Kharg-Bahregansar NGL and Gas Treatment project (Kharg NGL project).

3: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVM v.1.2 para 206 & 221(d))
Issue:
The DOE is requested to further explain the consistency of the application of standard conditions (15 0C and 1.01325 bar) applied to parameters- Vc1,y, Vc2,y, Vc3,y, VD1,y, VD2,y and VL,y given that these parameters shall be measured at standard conditions as per the registered monitoring plan whereas the parameters VD1,y, VD2,y and VL,y have been measured at standard conditions and still applying the conversion factor (i.e. 0.9908).

4: Scope: The verification report does not state how the DOE verified the information flow for the listed parameters. (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue:
1. The DOE is requested to further clarify how it has verified the reset of the readings of the flow meters (totalizers) that have an overflow. In doing so, the DOE should verify the initial reference value of the totalizer used within the monitoring period.
2. The DOE is requested to clarify how it has cross checked the uncertainty assessment for variables as required by the registered monitoring plan and the applied methodology AM 0009 version 03.3.

5: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue:
1. The DOE is requested to further verify all the calibration dates of the flow meters for parameters -Vc1,y, Vc2,y, Vc3,y, VD1,y, VD2,y and VL,y as mentioned on page 31 of the MR.
2. The DOE is requested to clarify how it has verified the weekly records of the laboratory analysis of carbon content for parameters - w carbon, c2, y, w carbon, c3, y, w carbon, D1,y and w carbon, D2,y in line with the registered monitoring plan.