05:53 01 May 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The monitoring report does not provide information on how the parameter "Other Flare Operational Parameters" was monitored.
2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue: The DOE has confirmed that the temperature of the exhaust gas above 700ºC does not represent a limitation in the operation of the flare because the operational capacity was within the range of the flare capacity, according to the clarification AM_CLA_047. However, it was identified that the flare is a "low-height" flare (height is less than 10 diameters, calculated based on the dimensions provided on page 40 from the verification report) and no justifications were provided on how the methane composition through the sampling section was confirmed to be uniform (only applicable in case of low height flares), as explained by the clarification AM_CLA_047.
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The monitoring report does not provide information on how the parameter "Other Flare Operational Parameters" was monitored.
2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue: The DOE has confirmed that the temperature of the exhaust gas above 700ºC does not represent a limitation in the operation of the flare because the operational capacity was within the range of the flare capacity, according to the clarification AM_CLA_047. However, it was identified that the flare is a "low-height" flare (height is less than 10 diameters, calculated based on the dimensions provided on page 40 from the verification report) and no justifications were provided on how the methane composition through the sampling section was confirmed to be uniform (only applicable in case of low height flares), as explained by the clarification AM_CLA_047.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: