Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: the emergency procedures and line diagram are not included in section C of the monitoring report.

2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: The PDD (page 6) states that the Dindigul plant is located in the coordinates: Latitude:10º 42’ 35” N & Longtitute: 78º 5’ 42” E while the monitoring report (page 3) states that the plant is located in Latitude: 10º 17’ 33.97” N & Longitude: 77º 52’ 6.60” E. Further, regarding the Pattukottai plant, the PDD states that it is located at 10.43° N 79.32° E while the monitoring report states it is located at Latitude: 10º 24’ 10.48” N & Longitude: 79º 15’ 06.89” E. However, the DOE makes no reference to the difference in the location coordinates for the two plants