22:34 06 Jul 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: If, during the verification of a certain monitoring period, the DOE identifies that the calibration has been delayed and the calibration has been implemented after the monitoring period in consideration (i.e. the results of delayed calibration are available), referring to the illustrative examples in the appendix below, the DOE may conclude its verification, provided the following conservative approach is adopted in the calculation of GHG emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG removals: (a) Applying the maximum permissible error 39 of the instrument to the measured values taken during the period between the scheduled date of calibration and the actual date of calibration, if the results of the delayed calibration do not show any errors in the measuring equipment, or if the error is smaller than the maximum permissible error (paragraph 366 of VVS for PA).
The DOE (p 27) states that "PP included the calibration details in Annex 1 of the revised MR and accounted Maximum permissible error of 0.2% has been considered for the non-calibrating period (10/02/2016 - 10/04/2016 & 11/10/2016 to 04/12/2017 & 03/06/2018 to 30/06/2018) as the error during the latest calibration certificate dated 11/08/2015, 11/04/2016 and 04/12/2017 is within the permissible limit. This is inline with VVS para 369 of EB 93 annex 5." The DOE is required to provide further information on how it validated the delayed calibration of the meters (HPU04204 & HPU04205) as per paragraph 366 of VVS for PA since 1) three calibration dates referred in the verification report are 11/08/2015 for the 1st calibration of HPU04204 & HPU04205 and both 11/04/2016 and 04/12/2017 for and 1st and 2nd calibration of 09539957 & 10058641 as per the annex of the monitoring report and 2) the monitoring report and the verification report do not provide information on when the delayed calibration of the meters (HPU04204 & HPU04205) was conducted including the outcome of the delayed calibration.
Further, there are inconsistencies regarding the 2nd calibration date for 09539957 (Main Meter) and 10058641 (Check Meter) since the page 17 of the verification report and the monitoring report state the calibration date as "05-12-2017" and p 27 of the report states "04/12/2017".
2: For the stakeholder consultation conducted after the publication of the first monitoring report in accordance with the “CDM project cycle procedure for project activities”, the requirements for and means of validation in paragraphs 254−260 above shall apply mutatis mutandis with the following adjustments (para 391 of VVS for PA).
The DOE states indicates in the section E.10. Global stakeholder consultation as "Not applicable". However, this is the 1st monitoring period after the registration.
1: If, during the verification of a certain monitoring period, the DOE identifies that the calibration has been delayed and the calibration has been implemented after the monitoring period in consideration (i.e. the results of delayed calibration are available), referring to the illustrative examples in the appendix below, the DOE may conclude its verification, provided the following conservative approach is adopted in the calculation of GHG emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG removals: (a) Applying the maximum permissible error 39 of the instrument to the measured values taken during the period between the scheduled date of calibration and the actual date of calibration, if the results of the delayed calibration do not show any errors in the measuring equipment, or if the error is smaller than the maximum permissible error (paragraph 366 of VVS for PA).
The DOE (p 27) states that "PP included the calibration details in Annex 1 of the revised MR and accounted Maximum permissible error of 0.2% has been considered for the non-calibrating period (10/02/2016 - 10/04/2016 & 11/10/2016 to 04/12/2017 & 03/06/2018 to 30/06/2018) as the error during the latest calibration certificate dated 11/08/2015, 11/04/2016 and 04/12/2017 is within the permissible limit. This is inline with VVS para 369 of EB 93 annex 5." The DOE is required to provide further information on how it validated the delayed calibration of the meters (HPU04204 & HPU04205) as per paragraph 366 of VVS for PA since 1) three calibration dates referred in the verification report are 11/08/2015 for the 1st calibration of HPU04204 & HPU04205 and both 11/04/2016 and 04/12/2017 for and 1st and 2nd calibration of 09539957 & 10058641 as per the annex of the monitoring report and 2) the monitoring report and the verification report do not provide information on when the delayed calibration of the meters (HPU04204 & HPU04205) was conducted including the outcome of the delayed calibration.
Further, there are inconsistencies regarding the 2nd calibration date for 09539957 (Main Meter) and 10058641 (Check Meter) since the page 17 of the verification report and the monitoring report state the calibration date as "05-12-2017" and p 27 of the report states "04/12/2017".
2: For the stakeholder consultation conducted after the publication of the first monitoring report in accordance with the “CDM project cycle procedure for project activities”, the requirements for and means of validation in paragraphs 254−260 above shall apply mutatis mutandis with the following adjustments (para 391 of VVS for PA).
The DOE states indicates in the section E.10. Global stakeholder consultation as "Not applicable". However, this is the 1st monitoring period after the registration.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: