Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The parameter CEFBl,therm (CO2 emissions intensity for thermal energy generation) is reported as 75.5 t CO2/TJ in the monitoring report and emission reductions calculations but as 77.37 in the registered PDD and verification report.

2: Scope: The verification report does not contain information on all CARs, CLs and FARs and/or provide an assessment and close out of any CARs, CLs or FARs issued. (VVM v.1.2 para 192, 194)
Issue: The parameters CODc,dig-out (data #11, COD concentration in discharged effluent from digester) and CODa,out (data #3, COD concentration of the effluent that leaves the lagoon) are presented as having the same average value over the monitoring period (i.e. 17.74 kg/m3) which would result in no project emissions being accounted for. The verification report (CR 16) mentions that erroneous measurements of these 2 parameters were observed in May 2010 and Jan 2011 but this is reflected in the ER spreadsheet only in January 2011.